Summary
Tens of thousands of ethnic
Somali civilians living in
eastern Ethiopia’s Somali
Regional State are experiencing
serious abuses and a looming
humanitarian crisis in the
context of a little-known
conflict between the Ethiopian
government and an Ethiopian
Somali rebel movement. The
situation is critical. Since
mid-2007, thousands of people
have fled, seeking refuge in
neighboring Somalia and Kenya
from widespread Ethiopian
military attacks on civilians
and villages that amount to war
crimes and crimes against
humanity.
For those who remain in the
war-affected area, continuing
abuses by both rebels and
Ethiopian troops pose a direct
threat to their survival and
create a pervasive culture of
fear. The Ethiopian military
campaign of forced relocations
and destruction of villages
reduced in early 2008 compared
to its peak in mid-2007, but
other abuses — including
arbitrary detentions, torture,
and mistreatment in
detention—are continuing. These
are combining with severe
restrictions on movement and
commercial trade, minimal access
to independent relief
assistance, a worsening drought,
and rising food prices to create
a highly vulnerable population
at risk of humanitarian
disaster.
Although the conflict has been
simmering for years with
intermittent allegations of
abuses, it took on dramatic new
momentum after the Ogaden
National Liberation Front (ONLF)
attacked a Chinese-run oil
installation in Somali Region in
April 2007, killing more than 70
Chinese and Ethiopian civilians.
The Ethiopian People’s
Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF)
government, led by Prime
Minister Meles Zenawi, responded
by launching a brutal
counter-insurgency campaign in
the five zones of Somali Region
primarily affected by the
conflict: Fiiq, Korahe, Gode,
Wardheer, and Dhagahbur. In
these zones the Ethiopian
National Defense Forces (ENDF)
have deliberately and repeatedly
attacked civilian populations in
an effort to root out the
insurgency.
Ethiopian troops have forcibly
displaced entire rural
communities, ordering villagers
to leave their homes within a
few days or witness their houses
being burnt down and their
possessions destroyed—and risk
death. Over the past year, Human
Rights Watch has documented the
execution of more than 150
individuals, many of them in
demonstration killings, with
Ethiopian soldiers singling out
relatives of suspected ONLF
members, or making apparently
arbitrary judgments that
individuals complaining to
soldiers or resisting their
orders are ONLF supporters.
These executions have sometimes
involved strangulation, after
which their bodies are left
lying in the open as a warning,
for villagers to bury. The
information confirmed by Human
Rights Watch is only a glimpse
of what is taking place—real
figures are likely to be higher.
Mass detentions without any
judicial oversight are routine.
Hundreds—and possibly
thousands—of individuals have
been arrested and held in
military barracks, sometimes
multiple times, where they have
been tortured, raped, and
assaulted. Confiscation of
livestock (the main asset among
the largely pastoralist
population), restrictions on
access to water, food, and other
essential commodities, and
obstruction of commercial
traffic and humanitarian
assistance have been used as
weapons in an economic war aimed
at cutting off ONLF supplies and
collectively punishing
communities that are suspected
of supporting the rebels.
These crimes are being committed
with total impunity, on the
thinnest of pretexts. They are
generating a perception in the
area that simply being an ethnic
Somali —and particularly a
member of the Ogaadeeni clan
which constitutes the backbone
of the ONLF—is enough to render
a person suspect in the eyes of
the national government. As one
young man told Human Rights
Watch, ‘Anyone with a bowl of
water is suspected of supplying
the ONLF.’
Ethiopian military personnel who
ordered or participated in
attacks on civilians should be
held responsible for war crimes.
Senior military and civilian
officials who knew or should
have known of such crimes but
took no action may be criminally
liable as a matter of command
responsibility. The widespread
and apparently systematic nature
of the attacks on villages
throughout Somali Region is
strong evidence that the
killings, torture, rape, and
forced displacement are also
crimes against humanity for
which the Ethiopian government
bears ultimate responsibility.
The ONLF has also been
responsible for serious
violations of international
humanitarian law (the laws of
war). These include the summary
execution of dozens of Chinese
and Ethiopian civilians in the
context of its April 2007 attack
on the oil installation, the
ONLF practice of killing
suspected government
collaborators, and the
indiscriminate mining of roads
used by government convoys.
Those who ordered or carried out
such acts are responsible for
war crimes. Many civilians feel
trapped with no refuge from ONLF
pressure or the abuses by
Ethiopian troops.
The Ethiopian government has
repeatedly dismissed or
minimized concerns about the
human rights and humanitarian
situation in Somali Region. It
often claims, particularly to
the international audience, that
insecurity in the region is the
work of Eritrean-backed
‘terrorists’ seeking to
destabilize Ethiopia. There is
no question that the political
dynamics in Somali Region
intertwine with regional
dynamics and are influenced by
the continuing hostility between
Eritrea and Ethiopia as well as
events in neighboring Somalia.
The application of terrorist
rhetoric to the internal
conflict with the ONLF, however,
appears designed mainly to
attract support from the United
States as part of the ‘war on
terror.’ It does not justify
violations of international
human rights and humanitarian
law.
The government faces complex
challenges in Somali Region. The
ONLF, which claims to be seeking
self-determination for the
region, represents only a
segment of the divided Ethiopian
Somali community. There are
legitimate fears that the
escalating conflict across the
border in Somalia could spill
into Ethiopia. The authorities
face difficult questions on how
to best establish the rule of
law in a remote, povertystricken
region largely inhabited by
pastoralists who have little
knowledge of or confidence in
state institutions that have
long neglected them. Instead of
addressing these challenges in
good faith with efforts to build
institutions and accountability
to support the rule of law and
reduce the appeal of armed
groups, the government has
implemented violent repression,
echoing the response to the
region of previous Ethiopian
administrations.
The Ethiopian government’s
reaction to reports of abuses in
2007 has been to deny the
allegations, disparage the
sources, and actively restrict
or control access to the region
by journalists, human rights
groups, and aid organizations
(including by expelling the
International Committee of the
Red Cross in July 2007).
Due to increasing alarm over
humanitarian conditions,
particularly malnutrition rates
among children, the UN and some
nongovernmental organizations
were permitted to expand
humanitarian programs in parts
of the region in late 2007, a
small positive step. However
these operations have been
limited to certain geographic
areas, are vulnerable to
constant government threats and
harassment, are sometimes unable
to operate with sufficient
independence from government
control, and have no protection
mandate or capacity to respond
to the attacks on civilians
which remain the biggest
priority for many affected
communities.
The Ethiopian government’s
politicized manipulation of
humanitarian operations,
particularly food distribution,
plus the continued restrictions
on commercial traffic and trade
are creating a situation that—in
combination with the drought
produced by failed rains—could
quickly slip into catastrophe.
The Ethiopian government should
take urgent action to ensure
that the needs of vulnerable
civilians in Somali Region are
prioritized, including in
emergency appeals. Yet due to
government obstruction and
restrictions on access to
conflict-affected zones,
humanitarian agencies cannot
even conduct the independent
nutritional assessments needed
to fully assess the scale and
formulate a proper response to
the potential crisis.
The international response to
the situation ranges from
insipid to disingenuous. Western
governments, including the US,
UK, and European Union, which
cumulatively provide almost US$2
billion of aid to Ethiopia every
year and rely on the Ethiopian
government as a key ally in a
volatile region, have sent a
number of delegations to the
region but have refrained from
even mild public concern, much
less criticism. The US
government, which is a staunch
Ethiopian ally—particularly in
counter-terrorism efforts—and
has probably the greatest
leverage of any of the donor
governments, has minimized and
possibly actively ignored
internal concerns and reporting
on the situation.
Instead of maintaining the
complicity of silence, donor
governments should start using
their leverage to insist on
three sets of immediate actions
in Somali Region. Full
recommendations are given below.
First, both the Ethiopian
government and the ONLF should
support full, unhindered and
immediate access to the region
for independent aid
organizations, the media, and
human rights groups, and the
government should lift
restrictions on commercial trade
and civilian and livestock
movement, including across the
border with Somaliland.
Implementing this recommendation
would have an immediate positive
effect on civilian access to
water and grazing for their
livestock, food, and local
markets and could mitigate the
impending food crisis.
Humanitarian organizations
should also have immediate,
unimpeded access to conduct
independent nutritional surveys
in all affected areas and
properly monitor food
distribution to ensure it is not
diverted.
Second, the Ethiopian government
should immediately issue clear
public orders to the armed
forces and all other security
agencies in Somali Region to
cease abuses of civilians,
including the military’s forced
relocations, extrajudicial
executions, mass detentions, and
mistreatment of detainees. The
ONLF should also cease killings
of civilians, including
government officials, desist
from the indiscriminate use of
mines along key roads in Somali
Region and publicly commit to
abide by international
humanitarian law.
Third, Ethiopian authorities
should establish an independent
commission of inquiry to
investigate the allegations of
abuses by all parties to the
conflict and begin short and
long-term efforts to ensure
accountability for abuses by
government security forces in
Somali Region and elsewhere,
including judicial and security
sector reforms.
Rapid
implementation of these
recommendations could help to
avert catastrophe in Somali
Region. If the abuses continue,
denied by the Ethiopian
government and ignored by
international donors, the
outcome is all too clear: yet
another cycle of human rights
devastation, famine, and
impoverishment in a region which
already knows these trends all
too well, and thousands of new
victims, embittered by the
repeated denial of their rights
as human beings and Ethiopians.
Full_Report
(pdf* format - 1.6 Mbytes)
© Copyright, Human Rights
Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th
Floor New York, NY 10118-3299
USA