Is the US foreign policy to advance the US
interest or Ethiopian Interest?
The United States foreign policy in
Somalia could be summed up to advance
Ethiopian interests in the Horn of Africa.
America's most important national interest
in Somalia currently is the prevention of
Strong Somali Republic with a Pan-Somali
agenda or ideology to get a hold in Somalia.
The United States actions to turn deaf ear
to Ethiopian aggression against sovereign
Somalia while Eritrea draws scorn for its
alleged support for the Islamic Courts
cannot be explained other than the US
willingness to promote and support Ethiopian
dominance in the horn of Africa.
US maintain
this balance of domination through regional
balance and counter balances. For example
the Middle East is balanced by Israel. The
former Russian federation is balanced by
Russia. The South East Asia is balanced by
India and US is trying to balance East
Africa by Ethiopia. In the light of the
current Somalia developments; the Islamic
Courts Union is seen a threat to this
balance of power. The same way United States
sees Hugo Chavez’s recent election to be a
threat to this balance in the Latin America.
Preventing of
strong Somali Republic is widely recognized
as an important American interest and to
guarantee strong Somali Republic does not
emerge there is a reasonable expectation and
willingness to use force. The force could be
the use Ethiopia and Uganda as the balancing
factor. It could be in the form of surgical
strike against the Islamic Courts Union
leadership and infrastructure. It could also
come in the form of bolstering the current
transitional government and using it along
with IGAD forces to lessen the influence of
the Islamic Courts. All these measures would
back fire and would radicalize a nation of
warriors to be resolute in their desire to
establish their desired Republic with a huge
life and material cost. This is a worthy
cause for the Somalis but not for Ethiopia
and certainly not for the United States.
It does not
matter what actions the Islamic Courts take
or what they tell the world media; United
States sees them as threat to their national
and international interest. Regardless,
that the Islamic Courts came together to
prevent the threat posed by the warlords to
their schools and Islamic infrastructure or
that they might have more moderates than
hardliners. Most of them might be interested
in cooperating with a transitional
government if it recognizes the Islamic
Sharia and expels the Ethiopian troops and
warlords.
The United
States believes that the Islamic Courts are
threat to the US interest is cemented by
their believe that Colonel Hassan Dahir
Aweys, the current elected leader of the
Islamic Courts is their list of suspects. We
have no knowledge of what he has been
suspected of whether it is a legitimate
concern or conjecture similar to the closure
and now the cleared Albarakaat enterprises.
Nonetheless he makes the case for the
American argument that the Islamic courts
are bent on becoming another Taliban. On the
other side, since he is a decorated war
hero, an unquestionable nationalist, a man
not tainted by tribalism and the
architecture of the defeat of the warlords
he deserves to hold that position in the
eyes of the Somali people.
We all know
the US interest is not guaranteed by
pre-emptive strike as the case in Iraq makes
clear for anyone who paid attention the
developments there. Similarly, taking a
pre-emptive strike against the Somali
Islamic Courts might not be a wise move
either. First allow me to elaborate why I
believe this is a highly disastrous move.
First, the
Islamic courts are primarily from grass root
movements not an import from Arab countries
as Ethiopian prime minister would have you
to believe. In the eyes of the average
Somalis they are God sent and salvation from
self destruction. They have restored law and
order, prices of basic food have
dramatically reduced, and school attendance
has increased not only among boys but also
among girls. Remember, now mothers are not
afraid their daughters will be raped on the
way to school. High ways, airports, sea
ports and media channels which was shut down
for the past 17 years has been for the first
time opened for business.
Secondly, the
court system originated the region of the
Hawiye tribe; one of the largest tribes in
Somalia. The warlords that have been kicked
out of Mogadishu were all from the Hawiye
tribe. Therefore, the Hawiye tribes are all
united behind the Islamic Courts Union as
their sole representatives of their interest
among the wider clans. The credible members
of the Hawiye in the current Transitional
Government have all resigned from their post
and only the Prime Minister and few cabinet
members with addiction to alcohol and
narcotics are remaining. Therefore, actions
taken against the Islamic Courts Union are
not only interpreted an action against Islam
but also interpreted as a war against the
Hawiye and not from some virulent Islamic
group. If one wants to find out the outcome;
look the results when a sub-clan within
Hawiye was threatened by American forces in
Mogadishu; the outcome was bloody no one has
anticipated. The religion and tribal
instinct is the only thing that can put a
Somali in steroids.
Secondly, the
Hawiye top secularist leadership was
eliminated by clan warfare. What was left
were either killed by revenge tribal
killings or have migrated to overseas. Those
remained was of low quality that become
warlords or has worked with the warlord
system and has lost any credibility within
the wider Hawiye tribe. Therefore, the
Hawiye populace made a conscious effort to
work with the Islamic Courts leadership who
were seen as the only salvation from self
destruction and they would fight to teeth to
defend it. Even the Sufi mystics have
rallied around the Islamic Courts.
Thirdly, the
current Somali Transitional government is
seen by Somalis as illegitimate “Warlord
government” and very close to their arch
nemesis Ethiopia. The prime minister who is
Hawiye tribe was unknown figure until he was
selected by Ethiopia from a dormant IGAD
office in Addis Ababa and is seen too weak
to reach any consensus or mediate the
affairs of his besieged government let alone
create a unity government.
In addition,
the current president even though he has the
support of his tribe in Puntland; he once
defected to Ethiopia when Somalia was
engaged a war with Ethiopia and most Somalis
view him as a divisive figure and that is
the reason he always pleas for international
peace keeping force.
Fourth, the
Islamic Courts are seen pro-business of
sort; the closest you can compare is the way
the Republican party in the United States
are seen as pro big business and that makes
them to have close relationship with the
business community. The business community
with its formidable capital is behind them
as well.
Finally, the
Islamic Courts with their short term in
power and their limited experience in civil
affairs have shown a major progress in the
area of Security, infrastructure
rehabilitation and opening the Mogadishu
International Airport and Sea port. The
Islamic courts also opened a formal military
and police training to their different
militias so they can function as a unified
entity that has rules and structures. This
further consolidates the belief the Islamic
Courts are better alternative to the madness
and mayhem of the warlords.
Having pointed
out the Islamic Courts and the significance
of their rise to power; one must ask what
United States can do to “advance
American interests in the Horn of Africa”
without further complicating the
environment and creating another Mogadishu
fiasco? I do believe the United States must
look the issue of the Islamic Courts more
than just a religious sect that is bent on
attacking American Interest. I believe they
should be looked a viable alternative to
chaotic and order less system of warlords
that failed the Somali state and continues
to fail a Somali state to emerge.
The United
States should also see the current
transitional government is not one that the
world or Islamic Courts could take
seriously, because the warlords they have
kicked out of Mogadishu still dominate it.
Until an environment where the Islamic
Courts demands are met such as changing the
constitution to Islamic republic, making
sure Ethiopia takes its forces from Somalia
and replacing the prime minister and warlord
members of parliament to Islamic Court
members and recognizing Somalia is
indivisible any negotiation with the
government or support for the government
would end in failure.
Therefore, every effort must
be made to satisfy the reasonable conditions
of the Islamic Courts to accommodate the new
reality on the ground. I believe the US
should not leave this noble effort to the
squabbles of ineffective African regional
powers who each is vying for dominating or
installing their pro-governments. A good
place to bring together between the groups
could be Minneapolis Minnesota where most of
the Somali Diaspora in America lives. If
that is accomplished which is easily doable,
then one could argue the American foreign
policy is to
advance American interests in the Horn of
Africa.
Ali Osman
ccusmaan@gmail.com
Oct 26, 2006 |